Efficacy of Jailed Semi-Inflated Balloon Technique in Maintaining Side Branch Patency during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-A Novel Approach in Bifurcation Lesions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i6.1734Keywords:
Semi-inflated, PCI, Patients, JSBT, VesselsAbstract
Background: Bifurcation lesions offer a major PCI complexity due to their involvement of the main vessel in addition to the side branch with considerable risk to side branch thrombosis. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the jailed semi-inflated balloon technique (JSBT) in maintaining side branch (SB) patency during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary bifurcation lesions. Material and methods: This Cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Cardiology, Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology/National Institute of Heart Disease (AFIC/NIHD), Rawalpindi from May 2024 to Dec 2024. Data were collected through the non-probability consecutive sampling technique. A detailed medical history was taken, during which baseline characteristics and comorbidities were meticulously documented. Results: Data were collected from 118 patients according to criteria of the study. The mean age in Group I (JSBT utilized) was 59.8 ± 9.8 years, while in Group II (JSBT not utilized) it was 58.7 ± 11.2 years. Gender distribution was similar between the groups, with 64.4% males and 35.6% females in Group I, and 62.7% males and 37.3% females in Group II. Mean number of vessels involved was 2.3 ± 0.6 in Group I (JSBT utilized) and 2.2 ± 0.5 in Group II (JSBT not utilized), with no significant difference (p=0.47). The culprit vessel was most commonly the left anterior descending (LAD) artery in both groups, accounting for 45.8% in Group I and 47.5% in Group II (p=0.87). Conclusion: This study concludes that the Jailed Semi-Inflated Balloon Technique (JSBT) is a highly effective method for maintaining side branch (SB) patency during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in bifurcation lesions.
Downloads
References
1. Baber U, Kini AS, Sharma SK. Stenting of complex lesions: an overview. Nat Rev Cardiol [Internet]. 2010;7(9):485–96.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.116
2. Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, Ludwig J, Holmes DR Jr, Spanos V, et al. Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation 2004;109(10):1244–9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000118474.71662.e3.
3. Latib A, Colombo A. Bifurcation disease: what do we know, what should we do? JACC Cardiovasc Interv [Internet]. 2008;1(3):218–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2007.12.008
4. Stinis CT, Hu SPC, Price MJ, Teirstein PS. Three-year outcome of drug-eluting stent implantation for coronary artery bifurcation lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv [Internet]. 2010;75(3):309–14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22302
5. Lee JM, Park KW, Koo B-K, Kim H-S. Stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions: a literature and technical review. CurrCardiol Rep [Internet]. 2015;17(6):45.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11886-015-0595-7
6. Katritsis DG, Siontis GCM, Ioannidis JPA. Double versus single stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions: a meta-analysis: A meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv [Internet]. 2009;2(5):409–15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.868091
7. Hildick-Smith D, de Belder AJ, Cooter N, Curzen NP, Clayton TC, Oldroyd KG, et al. Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: the British Bifurcation Coronary Study: old, new, and evolving strategies: The British bifurcation coronary study: Old, new, and evolving strategies. Circulation [Internet]. 2010;121(10):1235–43.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.888297
8. Burzotta F, Lassen JF, Banning AP, Lefèvre T, Hildick-Smith D, Chieffo A, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease: the 13th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention [Internet]. 2018;14(1):112–20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00357
9. Giustino G, Stone GW. Provisional stenting of coronary bifurcations. JACC Asia [Internet]. 2021;1(1):65–7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.05.005
10. Guo Y, Peng H, Zhao Y, Liu J. Predictors and complications of side branch occlusion after recanalization of chronic total occlusions complicated with bifurcation lesions. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Dec 24];11(1).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83458-9
11. Tondas AE, Mulawarman R, Trifitriana M, Pranata R, Abisha SE, Toruan MPL. A systematic review of jailed balloon technique for coronary bifurcation lesion: Conventional-jailed balloon technique vs modified-jailed balloon technique. Cardiovasc Revasc Med [Internet]. 2020;21(10):1193–9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2020.03.001
12. Khan BK, Rahman MN, Tai JM, Faheem O. Jailed balloons for side branch protection: a review of techniques and literature. AsiaIntervention [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Jan 28];6(1):15–24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4244/aij-d-19-00025
13. Kırat T. Fundamentals of percutaneous coronary bifurcation interventions. World J Cardiol [Internet]. 2022;14(3):108–38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v14.i3.108
14. Ge Z, Gao X-F, Zhan J-J, Chen S-L. Coronary bifurcation lesions. IntervCardiol Clin [Internet]. 2022;11(4):405–17.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccl.2022.02.002
15. Ermis E, Department of Cardiology, Biruni University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, Ucar H, Demirelli S, Ipek E, Gur M, et al. Assessment of side branch patency using a jailed semi-inflated balloon technique with coronary bifurcation lesions. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars [Internet]. 2021;46(5):340–8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2018.47347
16. Durmaz E, Karadağ B. Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation: Jailed semi-inflated balloon technique. Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegiarsivi: Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegininyayinorganidir. 2018 Jul;46(5):337-9.
https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2018.35545
17. Nomura T, Wada N, Ota I, Tasaka S, Ono K, Sakaue Y. Inflation Pressure in Side Branch during Modified Jailed Balloon Technique Does Not Affect Side Branch Outcomes. J IntervCardiol. 2021 Feb 18;2021:8839897. PMID: 33679263; PMCID: PMC7906823.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8839897.
18. Khan BK, Rahman MN, Tai JM, Faheem O. Jailed balloons for side branch protection: a review of techniques and literature: Jailed balloons for side branch protection. AsiaIntervention. 2020 Jul;6(1):15-24. Epub 2020 Jul 20. PMID: 34912980; PMCID: PMC8525723.
https://doi.org/10.4244/AIJ-D-19-00025.
19. Zhang, W., Ji, F., Yu, X. et al. Long-term treatment effect and adverse events of a modified jailed-balloon technique for side branch protection in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 19, 12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0995-x
20. Ermiş E, Uçar H, Demirelli S, İpek E, Gür M, Çaylı M. Assessment of side branch patency using a jailed semi inflated balloon technique with coronary bifurcation lesions. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2018;46:340–8. https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2018.47347.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
