Frequency of Maternal and Perinatal Outcome of Repeat Cesarean Section
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i6.1815Keywords:
Repeat Cesarean Section, Maternal Outcomes, Perinatal Complications, Postpartum HemorrhageAbstract
Background: Repeat cesarean section is a common obstetric practice globally, often chosen due to concerns over uterine rupture and other complications associated with vaginal birth after cesarean. While it can prevent certain risks, repeat CS also introduces potential maternal and neonatal complications such as postpartum hemorrhage, puerperal sepsis, birth asphyxia, and NICU admissions. Objective: To determine the frequency of maternal and perinatal outcome of repeat cesarean section at Mardan Medical Complex Mardan. Study Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Duration and Place of Study: The study was conducted from February to August 2024 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan. Methodology: A total of 168 women aged 18–40 years undergoing elective repeat lower segment cesarean section at term (37–41 weeks) were included. Maternal outcomes (postpartum hemorrhage, puerperal sepsis) and perinatal outcomes (birth asphyxia, neonatal death, NICU admission, low birth weight) were recorded. Results: The mean age of participants was 29.98 ± 3.49 years. Postpartum hemorrhage occurred in 10.7% of cases, puerperal sepsis in 6.0%, birth asphyxia in 14.9%, neonatal deaths in 5.4%, NICU admissions in 29.8%, and low birth weight in 8.3%. Conclusion: Repeat cesarean section is associated with significant maternal and perinatal complications, with demographic factors playing a critical role in outcome variation.
Downloads
References
1. Kanjanakaew, A., Jiramanee, A., & Srimoragot, M. (2024). Providers’ perspective on vaginal birth after cesarean birth: A qualitative systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 24(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06921-1
2. Temmerman, M., & Mohiddin, A. (2021). Cesarean section: More than a maternal health issue. PLOS Medicine, 18(10), e1003792.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003792
3. ȘERBĂNESCU, L., Brezeanu, D., GRASA, C. N., MIREA, S., IONESCU, P., ROTAR, V., SURDU, T. V., & Costea, A. C. (2024). Placenta Praevia with abnormal adhesion – a retrospective study.
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202411.1574.v1
4. Jamshed, S., Chien, S., Tanweer, A., Asdary, R., Hardhantyo, M., Greenfield, D., Chien, C., Weng, S., Jian, W., & Iqbal, U. (2022). Correlation between previous caesarean section and adverse maternal outcomes accordingly with Robson classification: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Medicine, 8.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.740000
5. Murtada, M., Hakami, N., Mahfouz, M., Abdelmola, A., Eltyeb, E., Medani, I., Maghfori, G., Zakri, A., Hakami, A., Altraifi, A., Khormi, A., & Chourasia, U. (2023). Multiple cesarean section outcomes and complications: A retrospective study in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Healthcare, 11(20), 2799.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11202799
6. Ajmal, S., Farrell, T., Minisha, F., Al Obaidly, S., AlQubaisi, M., Khenyab, N., Ali, N., Salama, H., Rouf Pallivalappil, A., Al Dewik, N., & Al Rifai, H. (2024). Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries: A registry-based study from Qatar. Qatar Medical Journal, 2024(1).
https://doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2024.3
7. Liu, P., Zhang, X., Wang, X., Liang, Y., Wei, N., Xiao, Z., Li, T., Zhe, R., Zhao, W., & Fan, S. (2023). Maternal sepsis in pregnancy and the puerperal periods: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Medicine, 10.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1126807
8. Regmi, D. R., Dangal, G., Silwal, A., Shrestha, D. B., Oli, P. R., & Budhathoki, P. (2022). Repeat cesarean section among pregnant women in a tertiary center of Nepal: A descriptive cross-sectional study. Journal of Nepal Medical Association, 60(245).
https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.6597
9. Lupu, V. V., Miron, I. C., Raileanu, A. A., Starcea, I. M., Lupu, A., Tarca, E., Mocanu, A., Buga, A. M., Lupu, V., & Fotea, S. (2023). Difficulties in adaptation of the mother and newborn via cesarean section versus natural birth—A narrative review. Life, 13(2), 300.
https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020300
10. Dekker, J., Hooijer, I., Ket, J., Vejnović, A., Benagiano, G., Brosens, I., & Mijatovic, V. (2021). Neonatal uterine bleedings: An ignored sign but a possible cause of early-onset endometriosis – A systematic review. Biomedicine Hub, 6(1), 6-16.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000512663
11. Das, U., & Rout, N. R. (2024). Impact of normal vs. caesarean deliveries on child nutritional status and mortality in India: Insights from NFHS-5 data. BMC Pediatrics, 24(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-05149-4
12. Mino, Y., Miyahara, F., Miura, M., Imamoto, A., Fujii, H., Moriwaki, C., Yoshioka, K., & Namba, N. (2024). Risk of transient tachypnea of the newborn following elective cesarean section increases at a gestational age of 37 weeks compared to that at ≥ 38 weeks despite the exclusion of pre-existing risk factors for neonatal respiratory disorders. Yonago Acta Medica, 67(2), 150-156.
https://doi.org/10.33160/yam.2024.05.009
13. Yeganegi, M., Bahrami, R., Azizi, S., Marzbanrad, Z., Hajizadeh, N., Mirjalili, S. R., Saeida-Ardekani, M., Lookzadeh, M. H., Alijanpour, K., Aghasipour, M., Golshan-Tafti, M., Noorishadkam, M., & Neamatzadeh, H. (2024). Caesarean section and respiratory system disorders in newborns. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X, 23, 100336.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100336
14. Aravindan, A., Singh, N., Datta, S., & Bondili, A. (2024). Optimal timing of cesarean section following two or more prior cesareans: An investigation into maternal and neonatal outcomes (a two-center study). Cureus.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.64291
15. Ekhaguere, O. A., Okonkwo, I. R., Batra, M., & Hedstrom, A. B. (2022). Respiratory distress syndrome management in resource limited settings—Current evidence and opportunities in 2022. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 10.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.961509
16. Moon, H., Lee, J. H., & Kim, E. H. (2023). Maternal and neonatal morbidities associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor around term. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 66(1), 11-19.
https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.22248
17. Perveen, S. (2011). Maternal and neonatal adverse outcome at repeat cesarean delivery versus repeat vaginal delivery. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 21(2), 84-87.
https://jcpsp.pk/archive/2011/Feb2011/06.pdf
18. Figueroa, L., Harrison, M., Mazariegos, M., Goudar, S., Kavi, A., Derman, R., Patel, A., Das, P., Hibberd, P. L., Saleem, S., Naqvi, F., Goldenberg, R. L., Haque, R., Billah, S. M., Petri, W. A., McClure, E. M., Tan, S., & Krebs, N. F. (2023). Maternal and perinatal outcomes of women with vaginal birth after cesarean section compared to repeat cesarean birth in select South Asian and Latin American settings of the global network for women’s and children’s health research. Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology, 9(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-023-00169-x
19. Prabhakarrao, I. S., Bansode, S., & Balakuduru, S. (2020). Maternal and perinatal outcome in trial of labour after caesarean at tertiary care hospital: A prospective observational study. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10(1), 315.
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20205788
20. Aslam, M., Khan, M. A., Habib, F., Sadiq, H., Habib, M., & Munazza. (2023). Outcome of pregnancy in previous cesarean section comparing elective versus trial of labor (VBAC) at KRL hospital, Islamabad. The Professional Medical Journal, 30(07), 906-911.
https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2023.30.07.7400
21. Yaghmaei, M., Ajori, L., & Mokhtari, M. (2024). Repeat Cesarean Sections: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes and Complications. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research, 9(1), 95-101.
https://doi.org/10.30699/jogcr.9.1.95
22. Vecchioli, E., Cordier, A. G., Chantry, A., Benachi, A., & Monier, I. (2020). Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with induction of labor after one previous cesarean delivery: A French retrospective study. Plos one, 15(8), e0237132.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.