Evaluation of Work Authorization Prescribed by the Dentists of Different Qualifications and Experiences for Fixed Prosthesis

Abstract

Background: The quality and completeness of dental work authorization forms are critical for effective communication between dentists and dental technicians. Variability in the completion of these forms may be influenced by the clinical experience, education level, and designation of dental practitioners. Objective: To evaluate the work authorization prescribed by the dentists of different qualifications and experiences for fixed prosthesis to dental laboratory. Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 384 dental practitioners in the duration from 18 February, 2024 to 17 February, 2025. Data were collected on designation, education status, postgraduate qualification, and clinical experience. The completeness of WAFs was evaluated based on specific instruction variables. Statistical analysis was performed to assess associations using appropriate tests, with significance set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: The majority of participants were Trainee Medical Officers (41.7%) and postgraduates (54.2%), with FCPS being the most common postgraduate qualification (68.3%). Most dentists had 1–4 years of clinical experience (44.8%). The completeness of WAFs improved with increasing experience. For instance, the mention of return date increased from 56.1% among those with up to 1 year of experience to 96.5% among those with 5–20 years (p < 0.001). A similar trend was observed across other instruction variables such as crown type, pontic design, shade, and interocclusal record. Conclusion: Clinical experience influences the completeness of work authorization forms in dental practice. Enhanced training and awareness among early-career dentists may improve communication quality and treatment outcomes.