Maternal and Foetal Outcomes in Cesarean Hysterectomies Performed for Placenta Increta

Authors

  • Mehwish Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, People’s University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women, Nawabshah, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Farah Naz Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, People’s University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women, Nawabshah, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Shabana Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, People’s University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women, Nawabshah, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Sania Siyal Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, People’s University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women, Nawabshah, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Marina Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, People’s University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women, Nawabshah, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Raishem Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, People’s University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women, Nawabshah, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Naseem Mallah Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, People’s University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women, Nawabshah, Sindh, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i2.2048

Keywords:

Placenta Increta, Cesarean Hysterectomy, Maternal Outcomes, Fetal Outcomes, Peripartum Hysterectomy, Postpartum Complications, Obstetric Hemorrhage, Surgical Morbidity

Abstract

Background: Cesarean hysterectomy is a major surgical intervention, often performed as a last resort to manage life-threatening obstetric hemorrhage. Among its most severe indications is placenta increta, a form of abnormal placental adherence that invades the myometrium and can result in catastrophic blood loss, adjacent organ injury, and significant maternal morbidity. The rising incidence of cesarean deliveries has led to an increase in placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders, particularly in resource-limited settings like Pakistan, where antenatal identification and conservative management options remain limited. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the maternal and fetal outcomes associated with cesarean hysterectomies performed for placenta increta, and to identify clinical and surgical factors contributing to adverse outcomes in these cases. Methodology: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital, PUMHS unit, and 2 wards, on 52 women who underwent cesarean hysterectomy over six months from December 06, 2023 to June 05, 2024. Among them, 23 cases were confirmed as placenta increta. Patients aged 20–45 years were included, with data collected on demographics, obstetric history, intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, and neonatal outcomes. Statistical analysis using SPSS version 25 included descriptive statistics and comparative tests to identify trends and significance. Results: The mean maternal age was 33.2 years, with a high prevalence of prior cesarean deliveries. In placenta increta cases, estimated blood loss averaged 3,386 mL, and 40.6% required ICU admission. Adjacent organ injury occurred in 13%, and postoperative complications such as fever (26.6%), UTIs (10.9%), and psychological distress (50%) were common. Despite increased maternal morbidity, neonatal outcomes were generally favorable, with a mean birth weight of 2.55 kg and no perinatal mortality observed in the increta group. Conclusion: Hysterectomies performed for placenta increta carry significantly higher risks of maternal complications, reflecting the aggressive nature of this condition and the need for multidisciplinary preparedness. These findings emphasize the importance of early antenatal detection, risk stratification, and institutional readiness to manage PAS disorders. Public health strategies must rationalize cesarean use, enhance diagnostic capacity, and develop national conservative and surgical management guidelines. Further research is essential to evaluate long-term maternal and psychological outcomes and to explore the feasibility of fertility-preserving options in selected cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. CLARK, S. L., YEH, S., PHELAN, J. P., BRUCE, S., & PAUL, R. H. (1985). Emergency hysterectomy for obstetric hemorrhage. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 40(2), 82.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-198502000-00010

2. Fatima S, Gul R, Khan S. Psychological impact of hysterectomy in Pakistani women. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(3):701–5. Accessible via journal website or PubMed.

3. Silver, R. M., Landon, M. B., Rouse, D. J., Leveno, K. J., Spong, C. Y., Thom, E. A., ... & National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. (2006). Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 107(6), 1226-1232.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84

4. Machado, L. (2011). Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: Incidence, indications, risk factors and outcome. North American Journal of Medical Sciences, 358–361.

https://doi.org/10.4297/najms.2011.358

5. Eller, A. G., Porter, T. F., Soisson, P., & Silver, R. M. (2009). Optimal management strategies for placenta accreta. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 116(5), 648-654.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02037.x

6. Jauniaux, E., Kingdom, J. C., & Silver, R. M. (2021). A comparison of recent guidelines in the diagnosis and management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 72, 102-116.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.06.007

7. Haider, G., Zehra, N., Munir, A. A., & Haider, A. (2009). Frequency and indications of cesarean section in a tertiary care hospital. Pak J Med Sci, 25(5), 791-6.

8. Zafar, S, Kamal, A, Fatima, N. (2020). Rising cesarean section rates: a public health concern. J Pak Med Assoc. 70(4), 665-8.

https://jpma.org.pk/article-details/9925

9. Shamshirsaz, A. A., Fox, K. A., Erfani, H., Clark, S. L., Salmanian, B., Baker, B. W., ... & Belfort, M. A. (2017). Multidisciplinary team learning in the management of the morbidly adherent placenta: outcome improvements over time. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 216(6), 612-e1.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.016

10. Imudia, A. N., Hobson, D. T., Awonuga, A. O., Diamond, M. P., & Bahado-Singh, R. O. (2010). Determinants and complications of emergent cesarean hysterectomy: Supracervical vs total hysterectomy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 203(3), 221.e1-221.e5.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.007

11. Say, L., Chou, D., Gemmill, A., Tunçalp, Ö., Moller, A. B., Daniels, J., ... & Alkema, L. (2014). Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. The Lancet global health, 2(6), e323-e333.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(14)70227-X/fulltext?EXTKEY=I72RSBB

12. Sentilhes, L., Ambroselli, C., Kayem, G., Provansal, M., Fernandez, H., Perrotin, F., ... & Bretelle, F. (2010). Maternal outcome after conservative treatment of placenta accreta. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 115(3), 526-534.

https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d066d4

13. Weeks, A. (2015). The prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: what do we know, and where do we go to next?. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 122(2), 202-210.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13098

14. Mohamed, T. A. E. H., & Chandraharan, E. (2025). Recognition and management of postpartum hemorrhage. Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 7(1), 29-37.

https://journals.lww.com/mfm/fulltext/2025/01000/recognition_and_management_of_postpartum.6.aspx

15. Bowman, Z. S., Eller, A. G., Bardsley, T. R., Greene, T., Varner, M. W., & Silver, R. M. (2014). Risk factors for placenta accreta: a large prospective cohort. American Journal of Perinatology, 31(9), 799–804.

https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1361833

16. Shamshirsaz, A. A., Fox, K. A., Salmanian, B., Diaz-Arrastia, C. R., Lee, W., Baker, B. W., Ballas, J., Chen, Q., Veen, van, Javadian, P., Sangi-Haghpeykar, H., Zacharias, N., Welty, S. E., Cassady, C. I., Moaddab, A., Popek, E. J., Hui, S.-K. R., Teruya, J., Bandi, V., & Coburn, M. (2015). Maternal morbidity in patients with morbidly adherent placenta treated with and without a standardized multidisciplinary approach. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 212(2), 218.e1–218.e9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.019

17. Jauniaux, E., Collins, S., & Burton, G. J. (2018). Placenta accreta spectrum: pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 218(1), 75-87.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.067

18. Kwee, A., Bots, M. L., Visser, G. H., & Bruinse, H. W. (2006). Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a prospective study in The Netherlands. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 124(2), 187-192.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.012

19. Fitzpatrick, K. E., Sellers, S., Spark, P., Kurinczuk, J. J., Brocklehurst, P., & Knight, M. (2014). The management and outcomes of placenta accreta, increta, and percreta in the UK: a population‐based descriptive study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 121(1), 62-71.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12405

20. Mansouri, M., DeStefano, K., Monks, B., Singh, J., McDonnold, M., Morgan, J., ... & Haeri, S. (2017). Treatment of Morbidly Adherent Placentation Utilizing a Standardized Multidisciplinary Approach in the Community Hospital–Private Practice Setting. American Journal of Perinatology Reports, 7(04), e211-e214.

https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1608641

Downloads

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

Maternal and Foetal Outcomes in Cesarean Hysterectomies Performed for Placenta Increta. (2025). Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(2), 792-796. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i2.2048