Effects of Orthogonal Vs Parallel Plating on Fracture Healing for the Management of Intra-Articular Distal Humerus Fracture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i6.2362Keywords:
Distal Humerus Fracture, Orthogonal Plating, Parallel Plating, Intra-articular Fracture, Elbow Function, Fracture UnionAbstract
Objective: To compare the radiological and functional outcomes of orthogonal (90–90) versus parallel plating techniques in the operative management of intra-articular distal humerus fractures. Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at the Orthopedics Department of Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi, enrolling 80 adult patients with AO/OTA type C intra-articular distal humerus fractures during the period from October 2024 to March 2025. Patients were managed with either orthogonal (n=40) or parallel (n=40) dual plating based on surgeon preference and fracture morphology. Postoperative follow-up included clinical and radiographic assessments at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion (ROM), and radiological union on standard AP and lateral views. Complications such as non-union, implant loosening, and ulnar neuropathy were recorded. Results: At final follow-up, fracture union was achieved in 95% of patients in both groups. The mean MEPS score was slightly higher in the parallel plating group (89.6 ± 6.2) compared to the orthogonal group (85.7 ± 7.4), though not statistically significant (p=0.062). Elbow ROM was comparable between groups. Implant-related complications were observed more in the orthogonal group (12.5%) than in the parallel group (5%), but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Both orthogonal and parallel plating configurations result in comparable fracture union rates and functional outcomes in the management of intra-articular distal humerus fractures. Parallel plating may offer a marginal advantage in elbow function and fewer implant-related complications, but both methods remain viable and effective depending on fracture pattern and surgeon experience.
Downloads
References
1. Atalar AC DMSACO. Management of intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus with parallel or orthogonal double-plate fixation.. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc.. 2010; 44(2): 109–17.
2. Athwal, G. S., Hoxie, S. C., Rispoli, D. M., & Steinmann, S. P. (2009). Precontoured parallel plate fixation of AO/OTA type C distal humerus fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 23(8), 575-580.
https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0b013e3181aa5402
3. Athwal GS RDSS. The distal humerus: elbow trauma and reconstruction.. Orthop Clin North Am. 2008; 39(2): 185–95.
4. BRYAN, R. S., & MORREY, B. F. (1982). Extensive posterior exposure of the elbow. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 166, 188-192.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198206000-00033
5. Charissoux JL VGCCea. Internal fixation of distal humerus fractures: anatomical study of 100 osteosyntheses. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot.. 2007; 93(5): 427–36.
6. Claessen FM dVMKKea. Operative treatment of distal humeral fractures: A systematic review of functional outcome. Injury. 2015; 46(10): 1924–9.
7. Elhage R MABSea. Clinical outcomes of parallel versus perpendicular plating for distal humerus fractures. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020; 11(2): 313–7.
8. Gofton, W. T., MacDermid, J. C., Patterson, S. D., Faber, K. J., & King, G. J. (2003). Functional outcome of AO type C distal humeral fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 28(2), 294-308.
https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2003.50038
9. Greiner S HNBH. Outcome after open reduction and angular stable internal fixation for supraintercondylar distal humerus fractures. J Trauma. 2009; 66(2): 527–34.
10. Korner, J., Lill, H., Müller, L. P., Hessmann, M., Kopf, K., Goldhahn, J., Gonschorek, O., Josten, C., & Rommens, P. M. (2004). Distal humerus fractures in elderly patients: Results after open reduction and internal fixation. Osteoporosis International, 16(S02), S73-S79.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1764-5
11. Helfet DL HR. Internal fixation of the distal humerus: a biomechanical comparison of parallel and orthogonal plates.. Clin Orthop Relat Res.. 1995; 32(1): 89–96.
12. Lee JJ LTTCea. Surgical management of intra-articular distal humerus fractures.. EFORT Open Rev. 2021; 6(4): :255–64.
13. McKEE, M. D., WILSON, T. L., WINSTON, L., SCHEMITSCH, E. H., & RICHARDS, R. R. (2000). Functional outcome following surgical treatment of intra-articular distal humeral fractures through a posterior approach*. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 82(12), 1701-1707.
https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200012000-00003
14. O’Driscoll, S. W. (2005). Optimizing stability in distal humeral fracture fixation. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 14(1), S186-S194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.033
15. Self, J., Viegas, S. F., Buford, W. L., & Patterson, R. M. (1995). A comparison of double-plate fixation methods for complex distal humerus fractures. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 4(1), 10-16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1058-2746(10)80002-3
16. Shin, S. J., Sohn, H. S., & Do, N. H. (2010). A clinical comparison of two different double plating methods for intraarticular distal humerus fractures. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 19(1), 2-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.003
17. Patel SS HAAA. Postoperative elbow stiffness: a review. J Orthop.. 2020; 20: 261–6.
18. Södergárd, J., & Sandelin, J. (1992). Mechanical failures of internal fixation in T and Y fractures of the distal humerus. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 33(5), 687-690.
19. Sodha S RDZDJJ. Triple-plate fixation of the distal humerus. J Hand Surg Am.. 2008; 33(4): 465–72.
20. Kurer MH RM. The triceps-reflecting approach to the elbow: the triceps tongue. Injury. 1996; 27(4): 251–3.
21. Diederichs G IAKTea. MR imaging of radial and ulnar nerve lesions.. Eur Radiol. 2013; 23(4): 1035–48.
22. Tyllianakis M PAPAGP. Functional evaluation of intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus (AO Type C). Injury.. 2004; 35(8): 848–54.
23. Wada T ISSHTMMNTM..Treatment strategy for AO type C distal humerus fractures.. J Orthop Sci.. 2013; 18(6): 770–6.
24. Wiggers JK HGBKRD. Evidence for orthogonal versus parallel double plating in distal humeral fractures: a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.. 2014; 134(6): 897–902.
25. Wiggers JK BKAVea. Fixation of distal humerus fractures: A systematic review of biomechanical studies. Injury. 2016; 47(7): 1337–44.
26. Scolaro JA EAMS. Orthogonal versus parallel plate fixation for distal humerus fractures.. Orthop Clin North Am. 2013; 44(1): 19–25.
27. Ring D GLCKJJ. Clinical results of elbow fractures treated with parallel plate fixation.. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(4): 694–700.
28. Lee SK PMLK. Functional outcomes of double-plate fixation for comminuted intra-articular distal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.. 2010; 19(2): 195–9.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
