Impact of Placenta Previa on Neonatal and Maternal Health
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i6.2521Keywords:
placenta previa; placenta accreta spectrum; postpartum haemorrhage; transfusion; hysterectomy; prematurity; NICU; neuraxial anaesthesia; Pakistan; PUMHS.Abstract
Background: Placenta previa, increasingly linked to prior caesarean section, is a major driver of peripartum haemorrhage, transfusion and hysterectomy, with downstream neonatal risks from prematurity and intensive care. Objective: To quantify maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with placenta previa and suspected placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), and to identify practice factors associated with morbidity in a tertiary centre, PUMHS Nawab Shah. Methods: Analytical cohort was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, PUMHS (Shaheed Benazirabad) over six months (9 Jul 2024–9 Jan 2025). We analysed 150 consecutive ultrasound-diagnosed low-lying/previa pregnancies. Data were abstracted using a standard proforma. Descriptive summarised case mix; χ²/Fisher’s exact and Mann–Whitney/Kruskal–Wallis compared groups; selected logistic models explored adjusted associations (α=0.05). Results: Complete/major previa comprised 42.0%; anterior implantation 54.0%; PAS suspected 42.7%. Median quantified blood loss was 1691 ml (IQR 1210–2050); PPH≥1000 ml 88.7%, transfusion 90.0%, hysterectomy 14.7%, ICU 18.7%. Gestational age was 35.9±1.9 weeks; preterm <37w 72.7%; NICU admission 70.7%; Apgar<7 at 5 min 11.3%. PAS suspicion was associated with higher NICU use (χ² p=0.0000) and greater maternal morbidity; QBL differed across placenta types (Kruskal–Wallis p=0.0000). Conclusions and implications: In this high-risk cohort, placenta previa especially with anterior location and PAS suspicion was associated with heavy bleeding, transfusion, and intensive care, alongside substantial prematurity and NICU demand. Findings support strengthening antenatal mapping and PAS pathways, planned team-based delivery, neuraxial anaesthesia where feasible, and haemorrhage bundles (including timely TXA) within Pakistan’s tertiary network.
Downloads
References
1. World Health Organization. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: WHO; 2015.
https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/161442
2. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341-1348.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31928-7/fulltext
3. Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, et al. Short- and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1349-1357.
https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/4649993/
4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Placenta Accreta Spectrum (Obstetric Care Consensus No. 7). Obstet Gynecol. 2018.
5. Jauniaux E, Chantraine F, Silver RM, Langhoff-Roos J. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum—prenatal diagnosis and screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;140(3):274-280. https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.12406
6. National Institute of Population Studies (NIPS) [Pakistan] and ICF. Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2017-18. Islamabad and Rockville, MD; 2019.
https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR354/FR354.pdf
7. Amjad A, Amjad U, Zakar R, et al. Trends of caesarean section deliveries in Pakistan: secondary data analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20:472.
https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-020-03457-y
8. Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;66(1):89-92.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4011075/
9. Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(6):976-980.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12052584/
10. Downes KL, Hinkle SN, Sjaarda LA, et al. Previous prelabor cesarean delivery and the risk of placenta previa. Am J Perinatol. 2015;32(11):1031-1036.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416991
11. Anderson-Bagga FM, Sze A. Placenta Previa. In: StatPearls [Internet]. 2023.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539818/
12. Jenabi E, Khazaei S, Bashirian S, et al. Risk factors associated with placenta previa: an umbrella review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;159(3):733-742.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34768164/
13. Karami M, Ranjbaran M, et al. Placenta previa and assisted reproductive techniques: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(14):1940-1947.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14767058.2017.1332035
14. Rao J, Qureshi Z, Sumiya K, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of placenta previa: a cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2021;13(7):e16589.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273910
15. Ashraf S, Azeem S, Gilani SA, et al. Association of obstetrical hysterectomy with rising rates of previous caesarean section among women with placenta previa. Pak J Med Sci. 2023;39(1). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9842977
16. Iftikhar R, Naseem I, et al. Placenta praevia with multiparity & previous cesarean section: maternal and fetal outcomes. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2017;67(5).
https://www.pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/download/2495/2050/4664
17. Maqsood U, et al. Frequency of placenta previa among women with previous cesarean section. Pak J Health Sci. 2024. https://www.thejas.com.pk/index.php/pjhs/article/view/2010
18. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists (RCOG). Placenta Praevia and PAS—Green-top 27a. BJOG. 2019;126:e1–e48. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30260097/
19. World Health Organization. Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/275377/9789241550338-eng.pdf
20. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Quality-improvement strategies for safe reduction of primary cesarean birth. Committee Statement; 2025.
21. Matsuzaki S, Mandelbaum RS, Matsushima K, et al. Trends, characteristics, and outcomes of placenta accreta spectrum: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021;3(4):100–117.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8377070/ PMC
22. Xie R-H, Gaudet L, Krewski D, et al. Comparison of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes among placenta previa cases with and without prior cesarean. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021;43(11):1325-1333. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1701216321000621 ScienceDirect
23. Mukhopadhyay D, Quadri A, Wankhede R, et al. Risk factors for urological complications associated with placenta previa/accreta: a retrospective study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022;58(1):123.
https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/58/1/123 MDPI
24. Pan Y-Y, Yeh C-C, Chen S-W, et al. Bleeding-related outcomes of total placenta previa: risk factors include prior cesarean and anterior placenta. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;61(4):
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455922000754 ScienceDirect
25. D’Souza R, Jacob CE, et al. Incidence and risk factors for severe postpartum haemorrhage in placenta previa vs low-lying placenta: a population-based study. BJOG. 2023;130:
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17554 Obstetrics & Gynecology
26. Zhong W, Chen Y, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after planned vs emergent delivery for PAS: a systematic review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8:731412.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.731412/full Frontiers
27. Young H, Albaghdadi M, et al. Effect of a PAS multidisciplinary team and checklist on outcomes. Int J Womens Health. 2022; 14:1305-1315.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9586585/ PMC
28. Jansen CHJR, van Leeuwen M, Pajkrt E, et al. Risk of preterm birth for placenta previa or low-lying placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022;4(5):100715. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9478860/ PMC
29. Bestel M, Türk VA, Ekiz A, et al. Placenta previa and adverse neonatal outcomes in a tertiary center. Bagcilar Med Bull. 2024;9(2):106-113.
https://doi.org/10.4274/bmb.galenos.2024.2024-03-029
30. Sertel E, Tapisiz Ö, et al. Planned vs emergency delivery in placenta previa with/without PAS: maternal, neonatal and surgical outcomes. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;21
https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2024.58291
31. Fan D, Chen Z, et al. Neuraxial anesthesia vs general anesthesia for cesarean in placenta previa: maternal and neonatal outcomes. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021; 21:294.
https://bmcanesthesiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12871-021-01472-w BioMed Central
32. Liu C, Tanaka M, et al. Perinatal outcomes with neuraxial vs general anesthesia in PAS (propensity-matched study). J Anesth. 2024;38
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38345633/ PubMed
33. Sentilhes L, Winer N, Azria E, et al. Tranexamic acid to prevent blood loss after cesarean (TRAAP2). N Engl J Med. 2021; 384:1623-1634.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2028788 New England Journal of Medicine
34. Pacheco LD, Saade GR, et al. Tranexamic acid to prevent obstetrical hemorrhage after delivery—evidence from two large trials. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2207419 New England Journal of Medicine
35. Peitsidis P, D’Alton ME, et al. Tranexamic acid for obstetric hemorrhage: updated evidence and guidance. J Clin Med. 2023;12(20):
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10573555/
36. Liu C, Li W, et al. Abdominal aortic vs internal iliac balloon occlusion in PAS: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(10):3546-3560.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34171597/ PubMed
37. Pimenta NDS, Nascimento K, et al. Prophylactic internal iliac artery balloon occlusion in PAS: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025;
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40535423/ PubMed
38. Shazly SA, Dowell A, et al. Placenta accreta risk-antepartum (PAR-A) score and adverse outcomes: validation study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34674270/ PubMed
39. Nguyen PN, Tran MH, et al. Neonatal outcomes in surgical management of PAS: planned vs emergency and conservative techniques. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024;24:
https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-024-06349-7 BioMed Central
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.