Frequency of Proptosis in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis Patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.2619Keywords:
Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS), ProptosisAbstract
Background: Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a distinct form of chronic sinus inflammation associated with nasal polyps. It typically involves a hypersensitive immune response to fungal elements, where thick mucus rich in eosinophils and fungal filaments accumulates inside the sinuses. Proptosis is an abnormal protrusion of the eyeball usually associated with AFRS. Objective: To determine the frequency of proptosis in patients with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. Methods: This cross sectional study included 120 patients diagnosed with Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS). Key information such as age, gender, and symptom duration was collected for each participant. Proptosis was assessed through clinical examination and noted accordingly. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Associations were assessed using chi-square and independent t-tests, with statistical significance set at a p-value less than 0.05. Results: Among the 120 patients diagnosed with Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS), 59 (49.2%) presented with proptosis, indicating that orbital involvement is relatively common in this condition. While slightly more females than males showed this finding (52.6% vs. 46.0%), the difference observed was not statistically significant, as indicated by a p-value of 0.470. Age-wise, the highest frequency of proptosis was observed in the 46–60 age group (54.5%), but again, no significant association was found (p = 0.669). When symptom duration was considered, proptosis appeared across all durations with similar frequency, and no clear relationship was established (p = 0.986). In addition, there was no significant difference in average age or duration of symptoms between patients with and without proptosis (p > 0.05). Conclusion: This research showed proptosis is a fairly frequent finding in AFRS, affecting nearly half of the patients studied. However, it does not appear to be strongly linked to patient age, gender, or how long symptoms have been present. These results suggest that factors beyond basic demographics—such as anatomical differences or the behavior of the disease itself—may have a greater role in determining orbital involvement. Larger-scale studies that include radiological and histological evaluation are needed to better understand what influences the risk of proptosis in AFRS.
Downloads
References
1. Gan EC, Thamboo A, Rudmik L, Hwang PH, Ferguson BJ, Javer AR. Medical management of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis following endoscopic sinus surgery: an evidence-based review and recommendations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014;4(9):702-15.
https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21352
2. Kaur R, Lavanya S, Khurana N, Gulati A, Dhakad MS. Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India. J Allergy (Cairo). 2016;2016(7698173.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7698173.
3. De Corso E, Bilò MB, Matucci A, Seccia V, Braido F, Gelardi M, et al. Personalized Management of Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps in Clinical Practice: A Multidisciplinary Consensus Statement. J Pers Med. 2022;12(5):
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050846.
4. AlQahtani A, Alim B, Almudhaibery F, Mulafikh D, Almutairi S, Almohanna S, et al. The Impact of Climatic, Socioeconomic, and Geographic Factors on the Prevalence of Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Worldwide Ecological Study. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022;36(4):423-31.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924211069226.
5. Ghegan M, Lee F-S, Schlosser R. Incidence of Skull Base and Orbital Erosion in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS) and Non-AFRS. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2006;134(592-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2005.11.025.
6. Tyler MA, Luong AU. Current understanding of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery. 2018;4(3):179-85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2018.08.003.
7. Chakrabarti A, Kaur H. Allergic Aspergillus Rhinosinusitis. J Fungi (Basel). 2016;2(4):
https://doi.org/10.3390/jof2040032.
8. Chua AJ, Jafar A, Luong AU. Update on allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. 2023;131(3):300-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2023.02.018.
9. Saravanan K, Panda NK, Chakrabarti A, Das A, Bapuraj RJ. Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis: An Attempt to Resolve the Diagnostic Dilemma. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery. 2006;132(2):173-8.
https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.132.2.173.
10. Deutsch PG, Whittaker J, Prasad S. Invasive and Non-Invasive Fungal Rhinosinusitis-A Review and Update of the Evidence. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019;55(7):
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55070319.
11. Liu MY, Chen PG, Weitzel EK, Lopez EM. Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Contemporary Update. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal. 0(0):01455613251346578.
https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613251346578.
12. Topilow NJ, Tran AQ, Koo EB, Alabiad CR. Etiologies of Proptosis: A review. Intern Med Rev (Wash D C). 2020;6(3):
https://doi.org/10.18103/imr.v6i3.852.
13. Dsouza S, Kandula P, Kamath G, Kamath M. Clinical Profile of Unilateral Proptosis in a Tertiary Care Centre. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017(8546458.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8546458.
14. O'Donnell NP, Virdi M, Kemp EG. Hertel exophthalmometry: the most appropriate measuring technique. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83(9):1096b.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.83.9.1096b.
15. Chen X, Chen J, Wang J, Xu M, Xue T, Zha D, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment of unilateral allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: a retrospective case series and literature review. Frontiers in Allergy. 2025;Volume 6 – 2025.
https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2025.1521574.
16. Al Dousary S. Ophthalmic Manifestations of Allergic Fungal Sinusitis. Saudi Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 2011;13(2):108-10.
https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-8491.274753.
17. McClay JE, Marple B, Kapadia L, Biavati MJ, Nussenbaum B, Newcomer M, et al. Clinical presentation of allergic fungal sinusitis in children. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(3):565-9.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200203000-00028.
18. Mombaerts I, Goldschmeding R, Schlingemann RO, Koornneef L. What is orbital pseudotumor? Surv Ophthalmol. 1996;41(1):66-78.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6257(97)81996-0.
19. Ferguson BJ. Definitions of fungal rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2000;33(2):227-35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0030-6665(00)80002-x.
20. Lloyd G, Lund VJ, Howard D, Savy L. Optimum imaging for sinonasal malignancy. J Laryngol Otol. 2000;114(7):557-62.
https://doi.org/10.1258/0022215001906174.
21. Xu T, Guo X-T, Zhou Y-C, Zhou Q, Wang Y-F. Consideration of the Clinical Diagnosis of Allergic Fungal Sinusitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal. 2023;014556132311672.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
