Prophylactic Ephedrine versus Phenylephrine for Prevention of Maternal Hypotension Following Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study

Authors

  • Deepak Doltani Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Daisy Hill Hospital, Newry, Northern Ireland, UK
  • Baby Saba Department of Anesthesia, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplant (SIUT), Karachi, Pakistan
  • Maria Hashmi Department of Anaesthesia, Aga Khan University and Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Syed Wahaj Uddin Department of Anesthesia, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplant (SIUT), Karachi, Pakistan
  • Sahito Khan Department of Anesthesiology, Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences, Gambat, Pakistan
  • Muzna Ahmed Khan Department of Anesthesia, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplant (SIUT), Karachi, Pakistan
  • Ushna Asif Department of Anesthesia, Patel Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v4i1.2852

Keywords:

Ephedrine; Phenylephrine; Spinal anesthesia; Cesarean section; Maternal hypotension

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of prophylactic intravenous bolus ephedrine and phenylephrine in preventing maternal hypotension following spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Study Design: Prospective randomized comparative study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anesthesiology, Dow University of Health Sciences and Civil Hospital Karachi, from June to December 2023. Methodology: One hundred and sixty-six ASA physical status I–II parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive either ephedrine 10 mg IV (Group E, n=83) or phenylephrine 100 µg IV (Group P, n=83) as a prophylactic bolus administered three minutes prior to spinal anesthesia. Maternal hypotension was defined as a >20% reduction in mean arterial pressure (MAP) from baseline at any intraoperative time point. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 11. Results: Maternal hypotension occurred in 56 (67.5%) patients in Group E and 74 (89.2%) patients in Group P (p=0.001). Conclusion: In a bolus-based vasopressor protocol, prophylactic ephedrine was more effective than phenylephrine in preventing maternal hypotension following spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Kinsella SM, Carvalho B, Dyer RA, et al. International consensus statement on the management of hypotension during cesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2018;73:71–92.

https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14080

2. Ngan Kee WD. Phenylephrine infusion for maintaining blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2017;125:1–5.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0000460372.74456.99

3. Allen TK, George RB, White WD, et al. Phenylephrine infusion versus bolus during spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:1–8.

4. Dyer RA, Reed AR, Van Dyk D, et al. Hemodynamic effects of ephedrine and phenylephrine boluses. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123:1–7.

https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e3181b437e0

5. Ngan Kee WD, Lee A, Khaw KS. Vasopressor management during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesthesiology. 2016;125:1–10.

6. Klohr S, Roth R, Hofmann T, et al. Definitions of hypotension after spinal anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015;15:1–9.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0000400328.72582.b1

7. Stewart A, Fernando R, McDonald S, et al. Dose-dependent effects of phenylephrine boluses. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014;23:1–6.

https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181f2eae1

8. Carvalho B, Dyer RA. Vasopressors for spinal hypotension in obstetrics. Anesthesiology. 2018;129:1–4.

https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000000602

9. Ngan Kee WD. The use of vasopressors during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017;30:319–325.

https://doi.org/10.1097/aco.0000000000000453

10. Banerjee A, Stocche RM, Angle P, et al. Comparison of ephedrine and phenylephrine boluses. Can J Anaesth. 2014;61:1–8.

11. Klöhr S, Roth R, Hofmann T. Maternal hypotension and fetal outcome. Anesth Analg. 2016;122:1–9.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0000400328.72582.b1

12. Magalhaes E, Govêia CS, Ladeira LC, et al. Ephedrine versus phenylephrine. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2014;64:1–7.

https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-70942009000100003

13. Kinsella SM. Lateral tilt and vasopressors in obstetric anesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2019;74:1–6.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0000443366.71295.22

14. Dyer RA, Biccard BM. Ephedrine revisited. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020;33:304–310.

15. Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS. Vasopressor therapy in obstetrics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017;31:1–12.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Doltani, D., Saba, B., Hashmi, M., Syed Wahaj Uddin, Khan, S., Khan, M. A., & Asif, U. (2026). Prophylactic Ephedrine versus Phenylephrine for Prevention of Maternal Hypotension Following Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 4(1), 87-89. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v4i1.2852