Opioid-Sparing Analgesic Protocols in Postoperative Pain: A Retrospective Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v4i3.2975Keywords:
Opioid-sparing analgesia, postoperative pain, multimodal analgesia, opioid consumptionAbstract
Background: Postoperative pain management remains a critical component of surgical care, with opioids traditionally serving as the mainstay of analgesia. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of opioid-sparing analgesic protocols with conventional opioid-based analgesia in terms of postoperative pain control, opioid consumption, recovery outcomes, and complications. Study Design: Retrospective comparative study. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at Allied Hospital Faisalabad from June, 2025 November, 2025. Methodology: A total of 125 patients aged 18–70 years who underwent elective surgical procedures were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on analgesic protocol: opioid-sparing and conventional opioid-based analgesia. Data were retrieved from medical records, including demographic variables, postoperative pain scores (VAS), total opioid consumption within 24 hours, time to mobilization, length of hospital stay, and opioid-related complications. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Results: The mean postoperative VAS score at 24 hours was significantly lower in the opioid-sparing group (3.2 ± 1.1) compared to the conventional group (4.5 ± 1.3) (p < 0.001). Total opioid consumption was also significantly reduced in the opioid-sparing group (18.6 ± 6.4 mg vs 32.8 ± 8.7 mg, p < 0.001). Patients receiving opioid-sparing analgesia demonstrated earlier mobilization (14.2 ± 5.6 vs 20.5 ± 7.3 hours, p = 0.002) and shorter hospital stay (3.1 ± 1.2 vs 4.6 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Opioid-sparing analgesic protocols provide superior pain control, reduce opioid requirements, enhance recovery, and minimize complications compared to conventional opioid-based analgesia.
Downloads
References
1. Ghai B, Jafra A, Bhatia N, Chanana N, Bansal D, Mehta V. Opioid sparing strategies for perioperative pain management other than regional anaesthesia: A narrative review. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jan-Mar;38(1):3-10. Epub 2022 Feb 4. PMID: 35706649; PMCID: PMC9191794.
https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_362_19
2. Ioannidis O, Koltsida A, Anestiadou E, Ramirez JM, Fabbri N, Ubieto JM, Feo CV, Pesce A, Rosetzka K, Arroyo A, Kocián P, Sánchez-Guillén L, Bellosta AP, Whitley A, Enguita AB, Teresa-Fernandéz M, Bitsianis S, Symeonidis S. Recommendations for Perioperative Care in Liver Resection: The EUPEMEN (EUropean PErioperative MEdical Networking) Protocol. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 26;61(6):978. PMID: 40572666; PMCID: PMC12195212.
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61060978.
3. Opolka Y, Sundberg C, Juthberg R, Olesen A, Guo L, Persson NK, Ackermann PW. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Integrated into Pants for the Relief of Postoperative Pain in Hip Surgery Patients: A Randomized Trial. Pain Res Manag. 2024 Jun 27;2024:6866549. PMID: 39145150; PMCID: PMC11323988.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6866549.
4. Allahabadi S, Roostan M, Roddy E, Ward DT, Rogers S, Kim C. Operative management of hip fractures within 24 hours in the elderly is achievable and associated with reduced opiate use. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2022; 13:21514593221116331.
https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593221116331
5. Rikshöft. Annual report of the Swedish National Registry for Hip Fractures (RIKSHÖFT). Sweden: Swedish National Registry; 2020.
6. Alexiou K, Roushias A, Varitimidis S, Malizos K. Quality of life and psychological consequences in elderly patients after a hip fracture: a review. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:143–150.
https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S150067
7. Dyer SM, Crotty M, Fairhall N, et al. A critical review of the long-term disability outcomes following hip fracture. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16(1):158.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0332-0
8. Shimony N, Amit U, Minz B, Grossman R, Dany MA, Gonen L, et al. Perioperative pregabalin for reducing pain, analgesic consumption, and anxiety and enhancing sleep quality in elective neurosurgical patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and controlled clinical study. J Neurosurg. 2016; 125:1513-22.
https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.10.jns151516
9. Sivakumar W, Jensen M, Martinez J, Tanana M, Duncan N, Hoesch R, et al. Intravenous acetaminophen for postoperative supratentorial craniotomy pain: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. J Neurosurg. 2018; 130:766-72.
https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.10.jns171464
10. Staffa SJ, Zurakowski D. Five steps to successfully implement and evaluate propensity score matching in clinical research studies. Anesth Analg. 2018; 127:1066-73.
https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002787
11. Gjertsen JE, Baste V, Fevang JM, Furnes O, Engesæter LB. Quality of life following hip fractures: results from the Norwegian hip fracture register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):265.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1111-y
12. Griffin XL, Parsons N, Achten J, Fernandez M, Costa ML. Recovery of health-related quality of life in a United Kingdom hip fracture population. Bone Joint J. 2015;97(3):372–382.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B3.35738
13. Clark JD. Chronic postoperative pain: preventable or inevitable? Anesthesiology. 2021;135(2):215–217.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003839
14. Gómez M, Izquierdo CE, Mayoral Rojals V, et al. Considerations for better management of postoperative pain in light of chronic postoperative pain: a narrative review. Cureus. 2022;14(4):e23763.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23763
15. Lopes A, Seligman Menezes M, Antonio Moreira de Barros G. Chronic postoperative pain: ubiquitous and scarcely appraised: narrative review. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021;71(6):649–655.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2020.10.014
16. Zhang Z, Wang JJ, Ping ZG, Jin XG, Yang JJ, Wang Y, Chu QJ; Pain Group of the Chinese Society of Anesthesiology. The Impact of Opioid-Sparing Analgesia on Postoperative Pain and Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Ther. 2025 Oct;14(5):1473-1497. Epub 2025 Jul 25. PMID: 40711665; PMCID: PMC12484494.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-025-00762-2.
17. Scholten HJ, Buise MP. Epidurals in esophagectomy: end of an era? J Thorac Dis. 2026 Jan 31;18(1):2. Epub 2026 Jan 22. PMID: 41660469; PMCID: PMC12875810.
https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-2025-aw-2113.
18. The NO PAin Investigators. Effect of a Postoperative Multimodal Opioid-Sparing Protocol vs Standard Opioid Prescribing on Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Knee or Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022;328(13):1326–1335.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.16844
19. Jipa, M., Isac, S., Klimko, A., Simion-Cotorogea, M., Martac, C., Cobilinschi, C., & Droc, G. (2022). Opioid-Sparing Analgesia Impacts the Perioperative Anesthetic Management in Major Abdominal Surgery. Medicina, 58(4), 487.
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58040487
20. Kim, M., Huh, J., Choi, H., & Hwang, W. (2024). No Difference in Postoperative Recovery Outcomes Between Opioid-Free and Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia Under Multimodal Analgesic Protocol for Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(21), 6581.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
