Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography to Differentiate Between Benign and Malignant Lymph Nodes of Head and Neck Region Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard

Authors

  • Tayyaba Shaheen Department of Radiology, CMH Multan, Pakistan
  • Atif Latif Department of Radiology, CMH Multan, Pakistan
  • Nosheen Sadiq Department of Radiology, CMH Multan, Pakistan
  • Sadaf Aziz Department of Radiology, CMH Multan, Pakistan
  • Kanza Rehman Department of Radiology, CMH Multan, Pakistan
  • Iqra Altaf Department of Radiology, CMH Multan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i6.3136

Keywords:

Elastography, Strain index, enlarged lymph nodes

Abstract

Objective: To find out diagnostic accuracy of elastography to discern malignant from benign lymph nodes of head and neck region while the histopathology remains as gold standard. Study Design: This was a cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study:  The study was conducted in Combined Military Hospital Multan over a period of eight months from September 2024 to April 2025. Methodology: Patients of either gender with enlarged (≥10 millimeter) lymph nodes presenting to radiology department were selected and subjected to elastography strain index measurement. Lymph nodes with this value ≥2 were categorized as malignant. Biopsy sample was taken from all under study lymph nodes and subjected to histopathology which confirmed or rejected the validation of elastography strain index measurement. Results: The mean age of the participants turned out to be 37.4±15.1 years. Mean BMI was 25.7±2.2 kg/m2. Elastography strain index had diagnostic accuracy of 87.5%, sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predicted Value and Negative Predicted Value were 81.43%, 94.83%, 95% and 80.88% respectively. Conclusion: Elastography strain index measurement is a reliable yet noninvasive modality to discern malignant from benign cervical lymph nodes. It should be used as a valuable adjunct to other already prevailing ultra-sonographic modalities

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Goswami AK, Khaja MS, Downing T, Kokabi N, Saad WE, Majdalany BS. Lymphatic anatomy and physiology. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2020;37(3):227-36.

https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1713440

2. Sun L, Zhang L, Yang K, Chen XM, Chen JM, Xiao J, et al. Analysis of the causes of cervical lymphadenopathy using fine-needle aspiration cytology combining cell block in Chinese patients with and without HIV infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):224.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4951-x

3. Fahim RS, Abd El Basset AS, Youssef RS, Almakaram AA. Prevalence of different causes of cervical lymphadenopathy in Beni-Suef localities. Malaysian J Med Res. 2020;31(3):385-99.

https://doi.org/10.21608/mjmr.2022.220323

4. Yang J, Zhang F, Qiao Y. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound, CT and their combination in detecting cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2022;12(7):e051568.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051568

5. Turgut E, Celenk C, Sayit AT, Bekci T, Gunbey HP, Aslan K. Efficiency of B-mode ultrasound and strain elastography in differentiating between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes. Ultrasound Q. 2017 Sep 1;33(3):201-7.

https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000302

6. Kanagaraju V, Rakshith AV, Devanand B, Rajakumar R. Utility of ultrasound elastography to differentiate benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes. J Med Ultrasound. 2020;28(2):92-8.

https://doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_72_19

7. Vineela E, Sakalecha AK, Narayanrao Suresh T. Role of sonoelastography in differentiating benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes and correlating with pathology. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e22984.

https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22984

8. Bhutta MR, Majeed AI, Khan A, Zafar I, Azad H, Akhtar S. Diagnostic accuracy of elastography to differentiate between benign and malignant lymph nodes of head and neck region taking histopathology as the gold standard. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2023;73(3):670-3.

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i3.7553

9. Baig H, Shafiq ul Azam M, Akram A, Ali A, Asim A, Younas R. Diagnostic accuracy of elastography to differentiate between malignant and benign lymph nodes of neck and head region taking histopathology as gold standard. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2022;16(11):894-7.

https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs20221611894

10. Dietrich CF, Barr RG, Farrokh A, Dighe M, Hocke M, Jenssen C, et al. Strain elastography-how to do it? Ultrasound int open. 2017;3(4):137-49.

https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-119412

11. Cui XW, Li KN, Yi AJ, Wang B, Wei Q, Wu GG, et al. Ultrasound elastography. Endosc ultrasound. 2022;11(4):252-74.

https://doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-21-00151

Valera-Calero JA, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Fernández-Rodríguez T, Arias-Buría JL, Varol U, Gallego-Sendarrubias GM. Influence of examiners’ experience and region of interest location on semiquantitative elastography validity and reliability. Appl Sci. 2021;11(19):e9247.

https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199247

13. Kanagaraju V, Rakshith AV, Devanand B, Rajakumar R. Utility of ultrasound elastography to differentiate benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes. J Med Ultrasound. 2020;28(2):92-8.

https://doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_72_19

14. Yadav R, Malik A, Prasad R. Utility of Sonoelastography Beyond Sonography for Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Lymphadenopathy. SN Comprehensive Clin Med. 2021;3(10):2116-26.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-021-00980-7

15. Abdelgawad EA, Abu-samra MF, Abdelhay NM, Abdel-Azeem HM. B-mode ultrasound, color Doppler, and sonoelastography in differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes with special emphasis on sonoelastography. Egyptian J Radiol Nucl Med. 2020;51(1):e157.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-020-00273-4

16. Zhang F, Zhao X, Ji X, Han R, LiP, Du M, et al. Diagnostic value of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for assessing super-ficial lymph nodes: A diagnostic accuracy study. Medicine. 2017;96(43):e8125.

https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008125

17. Lo WC, Hsu WL, Wang CT, Cheng PW, Liao LJ. Incorporation of shear wave elastography into a prediction model in the assessment ofcervical lymph nodes. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0221062.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221062

18. McQueen AS, Bhatia KS. Head and neck ultrasound: technical advances, novel applications and the role of elastography. Clin Radiol. 2018;73(1):81-93.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.08.003

19. Han F, Xu M, Xie T, Wang JW, Lin QG, Guo ZX, et al. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy in cervical lympha-denopathy: A retrospective study of 6,695 cases. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(5):1809-17.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5116-1

20. Wu M, Ren A, Xu D, Peng X, Ye X, Li A. Diagnostic performance of elastography in malignant soft tissue tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021;47(4):855-68.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.12.017

21. Wang B, Guo Q, Wang JY, Yu Y, Yi AJ, Cui XW, et al. Ultrasound elastography for the evaluation of lymph nodes. Front Oncol. 2021;11(2):e714660. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.714660

22. Cè M, D’Amico NC, Danesini GM, Foschini C, Oliva G, Martinenghi C, et al. Ultrasound elastography: basic principles and examples of clinical applications with artificial intelligence—a review. BioMedInformatics. 2023 ;3(1):17-43. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedinformatics3010002

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Shaheen, T., Latif, A., Sadiq, N., Aziz, S., Rehman, K., & Altaf, I. (2025). Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography to Differentiate Between Benign and Malignant Lymph Nodes of Head and Neck Region Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(6), 1425-1428. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i6.3136