Obstetric Study to Exploring the Prevalence and Determinants of Cesarean Sections at Timeragra Teaching Hospital Dir Lower

Nazia Wahid; Ikram Ullah; Humaira Bibi; Sobia Ali; Arooj Batool; Lubna Islam; Hina Iftikhar

doi:10.70749/ijbr.v3i2.597

Authors

Nazia Wahid Timergara Teaching Hospital, Dir Lower, KP, Pakistan.
Ikram Ullah Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
Humaira Bibi Timergara Teaching Hospital, Dir Lower, KP, Pakistan.
Sobia Ali Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad, KP, Pakistan.
Arooj Batool Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad, KP, Pakistan.
Lubna Islam Timergara Teaching Hospital, Dir Lower, KP, Pakistan.
Hina Iftikhar Timergara Teaching Hospital, Dir Lower, KP, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i2.597

Keywords:

Cesarean Section, Maternal Health, Obstetric Factors, Dir Lower, Gestational Age, Infant Characteristics

Abstract

Cesarean section (CS) is a pivotal surgical procedure in obstetrics, often performed to manage complications such as dystocia, prior cesarean deliveries, fetal distress, and post-term pregnancies. Despite its importance, the increasing prevalence of CS raises concerns about over medicalization and its associated risks. This study explores the factors influencing CS in District Dir Lower KP, Pakistan, providing insights into demographic, educational, obstetric, and neonatal determinants. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with a total sample size of 123. Data were collected on variables including maternal age, education level, parity, gestational age, infant size, and gender. Statistical analysis was performed using percentages to identify significant trends and associations. Results: Age Group: Women aged 25-34 years had the highest CS rate (60.97%), followed by those aged ≥35 years (21.14%). Education: Primary education was most prevalent among women undergoing CS (42.28%), while higher education showed the lowest association (7.32%). Parity: Women with three or more children exhibited the highest CS rates (53.66%), whereas first-time mothers accounted for 12.20%. Gestational Age: Normal-term pregnancies (37-40 weeks) had the highest CS prevalence (56.91%), while post-term pregnancies accounted for 14.63%. Baby Size: Average-sized infants (2.5-4 cm) were associated with the highest CS rates (52.85%), compared to small (32.52%) and large infants (14.63%). Infant Gender: Male infants were more commonly associated with CS (62.60%) than female infants (37.40%). Conclusion: This study highlights the significant role of maternal age, education level, parity, gestational age, and infant characteristics in influencing CS rates in District Dir Lower Findings emphasize the need for evidence-based maternal health policies to optimize delivery outcomes and address unnecessary surgical interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Betrán, A. P., et al. (2007). Rates of cesarean section: Analysis of global, regional, and national estimates. Pediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 21(2), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x

Lieberman, E., et al. (1997). The association of fetal sex with the rate of cesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 176(3), 667–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/s00029378(97)70567-2

Molina, G., et al. (2015). The relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality. JAMA, 314(21), 2263. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.15553

Penna, L., & Arulkumaran, S. (2003). Cesarean section for non-medical reasons. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 82(3), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004660.pub3

Qublan, H., et al. (2002). Cesarean section rate: The effect of age and parity. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 28(1), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1341-8076.2002.00008.x

Rahman, M. M., et al. (2018). Determinants of cesarean section in Bangladesh. PLOS ONE, 13(9), e0202879. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202879

Rai, S. D., & Jan, R. (2019). Cesarean section rates in South Asian cities: Can midwifery help stem the rise? Journal of Asian Midwifery, 6(2), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.midw.2019.002

Rydahl, E., et al. (2019). Cesarean section on the rise—Does advanced maternal age explain the increase? PLOS ONE, 14(1), e0210655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210655

Althabe, F., Sosa, C., Belizán, J. M., Gibbons, L., Jacquerioz, F., & Bergel, E. (2006). Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low-, medium-, and high-income countries: An ecological study. Birth, 33(4), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536x.2006.00118.x

Betrán, A. P., Merialdi, M., Lauer, J. A., Bing-Shun, W., Thomas, J., Van Look, P., & Wagner, M. (2007). Rates of cesarean section: Analysis of global, regional, and national estimates. Pediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 21(2), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x

Lieberman, E., Lang, J. M., Cohen, A. P., Frigoletto, F. D., Acker, D., & Rao, R. (1997). The association of fetal sex with the rate of cesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 176(3), 667–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70567-2

Molina, G., Weiser, T. G., Lipsitz, S. R., Esquivel, M. M., Uribe-Leitz, T., Azad, T., T., Semrau, K., Berry, W. R., Gawande, A. A., & Haynes, A. B. (2015). The relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality. JAMA, 314(21), 2263. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.15553

Qublan, H., Alghoweri, A., Al-Taani, M., Abu-Khait, S., Abu-Salem, A., & Merhej, A. (2002). Cesarean section rate: The effect of age and parity. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 28(1), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1341-8076.2002.00008.x

Rahman, M. M., Haider, M. R., Moinuddin, Md., Rahman, A. E., Ahmed, S., & Khan, M. M. (2018). Determinants of cesarean section in Bangladesh: Cross-sectional analysis of Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2014 Data. PLOS ONE, 13(9), e0202879. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202879

Renes, L., Barka, N., Gyurkovits, Z., Paulik, E., Németh, G., & Orvos, H. (2017). Predictors of cesarean section – A cross-sectional study in Hungary. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 31(3), 320–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1285888

Rydahl, E., Declercq, E., Juhl, M., & Maimburg, R. D. (2019). Cesarean section on the rise—Does advanced maternal age explain the increase? A population register-based study. PLOS ONE, 14(1), e0210655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210655

World Health Organization. (2021). Cesarean section rates continue to rise, amid growing inequalities in access. WHO. https://www.who.int/news/item/16-06-2021-caesarean-section-rates-continue-to-rise-amid-growing-inequalities-in-access

Zeeshan, M., Iqbal, A., Rasul, S., Shahzad, I., Ashraf, S., & Akbar, A. (2021). Prevalence and associated factors of cesarean section in Punjab, Pakistan: Evidence from Multiple Indicators Cluster Survey (2017–2018). Pakistan Journal of Medical Research, 60(2), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.12345/pjmr.60.2