Effects of Intrathecal Midazolam (1mg) with Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% (15mg) for Spinal Anesthesia for Caesarean Section

Authors

  • Sharafat Khan Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Tahira Batool Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Arsalan Khan Institute of Health Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
  • Asma Irshad School of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Khalid Mehmood Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Shahid Ullah College of Medical Technology, Bacha Khan Medical College, Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
  • Shafi Ullah College of Medical Technology, Bacha Khan Medical College, Mardan, KP, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i2.639

Keywords:

Intrathecal, Midazolam, Hyperbaric Bupavicaine, Spinal Anesthesia, Cesarean Section

Abstract

Background: Intrathecal adjuvants are commonly used to enhance the efficacy of spinal anesthesia, particularly in cesarean sections. Midazolam, a benzodiazepine, has been studied for its potential analgesic and sedative effects when combined with local anesthetics. This study aims to evaluate the effects of intrathecal midazolam (1 mg) in combination with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (15 mg) for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section patients, assessing its impact on the duration of anesthesia, postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic stability, and adverse effects. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Qazi Hussain Ahmad Medical Complex, Nowshera, following approval from the institutional ethics committee. A total of 60 patients scheduled for elective cesarean section were included, with the sample size calculated using the WHO sample size calculator. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study period spanned from June 2024 to December 2024. Key parameters assessed included the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, postoperative pain relief, hemodynamic changes, and the incidence of complications such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and sedation. Results: The two study group total number of participants 60 each group of 30, variables included age, weight, height and ASA physical status. The sensory block were study with Holleman’s scale, group BM sensory block onset time is (93%) more than group B that is (90%). Motor block were study by Bromage’s scale and greater in group BM (100%) and less in group B(90%). Midazolam had profound antiemetic effects, as nausea and vomiting were not observed in the group BM and observed in 33% of patients in the group B. The post-operative analgesia time was evaluated by the time of first rescue analgesia requirement.  The duration of post-operative analgesia was longer in the group BM (mean=67.93) compared to the group B (mean=28.34). Conclusion: Addition of midazolam with bupivacaine for intrathecal block enhanced the efficacy and effectiveness of sensory block and prolonged the post operative analgesia time. Post-operative complications were study in both groups. Intra-op and post-op nausea and vomiting in group BM (3.3%) and (13.3%) in group.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zencirci, B. (2014). Midazolam in spinal anesthesia — Intrathecal or intravenous? Topics in Spinal Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.5772/58750

Chavan, S., Mumbare, S., Mane, M. (2010). Effect of addition of intrathecal midazolam to 0 . 5 % Bupivacaine on dura- tion of analgesia.

Kupietzky, A., & Houpt, M. I. (1993). Midazolam: a review of its use for conscious sedation in children. Pediatric dentistry, 15, 237-237. https://www.aapd.org/globalassets/media/publications/archives/kupietzky-15-04.pdf

Kim, M., & Lee, Y. (2001). Intrathecal midazolam increases the analgesic effects of spinal blockade with bupivacaine in patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 86(1), 77-79. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/86.1.77

Goodchild, C. S., Guo, Z., Musgreave, A., & Gent, J. P. (1996). Antinociception by intrathecal midazolam involves endogenous neurotransmitters acting at spinal cord delta opioid receptors. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 77(6), 758-763. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/77.6.758

Shadangi, B. K., Garg, R., Pandey, R., & Das, T. (2011). Effects of intrathecal midazolam in spinal anaesthesia: a prospective randomised case control study. Singapore medical journal, 52(6), 432. http://www.smj.org.sg/sites/default/files/5206/5206a7.pdf

Hidaka, S., Kawamoto, M., Kurita, S., & Yuge, O. (2005). Comparison of the effects of propofol and midazolam on the cardiovascular autonomic nervous system during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 17(1), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.03.012

Parthasarathy, S. (2012). The effect of addition of intrathecal midazolam 1.5 mg to bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology, 19(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.4038/slja.v19i2.2314

Ho, K. M., & Ismail, H. (2008). Use of intrathecal Midazolam to improve perioperative analgesia: A meta-analysis. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 36(3), 365-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x0803600307

Tucker, A. P., Mezzatesta, J., Nadeson, R., & Goodchild, C. S. (2004). Intrathecal Midazolam II: Combination with intrathecal fentanyl for labor pain. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 1521-1527. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000112434.68702.e4

Beale, N., Evans, B., Plaat, F., Columb, M., Lyons, G., & Stocks, G. (2005). Effect of epidural volume extension on dose requirement of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine at caesarean section. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 95(4), 500-503. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aei200

Boussofara, M., Carlès, M., Raucoules-Aimé, M., Sellam, M. R., & Horn, J. (2006). Effects of intrathecal Midazolam on postoperative analgesia when added to a bupivacaine-clonidine mixture. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 31(6), 501-505. https://doi.org/10.1097/00115550-200611000-00005

Park, J. M., Jeon, Y. H., & Hong, J. G. (2005). Effect of intrathecal Midazolam added to Bupivacaine on spinal anesthesia and Peri-operative sedation. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 49(4), 490. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2005.49.4.490

Kaya, F. N., Yavascaoglu, B., Turker, G., Yildirim, A., Gurbet, A., Mogol, E. B., & Ozcan, B. (2009). Intravenous dexmedetomidine, but not midazolam, prolongs bupivacaine spinal anesthesia. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 57(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-009-9231-6

Prakash, S., Joshi, N., Gogia, A. R., Prakash, S., & Singh, R. (2006). Analgesic efficacy of two doses of intrathecal Midazolam with Bupivacaine in patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 31(3), 221-226. https://doi.org/10.1097/00115550-200605000-00008

Ugur, B., Basaloglu, K., Yurtseven, T., Ates, U., Aydin, O. N., Özenç, D., Yurtseven, M., & Gürel, A. (2005). Neurotoxicity with single dose intrathecal midazolam administration. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 22(12), 907-912. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265021505001547

Hidaka, S., Kawamoto, M., Kurita, S., & Yuge, O. (2005). Comparison of the effects of propofol and midazolam on the cardiovascular autonomic nervous system during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 17(1), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.03.012

Zhao, J. (2014). Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam as premedication in anesthesia: A meta-analysis from randomized controlled clinical trials. Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research, 05(09). https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000457

Downloads

Published

2025-02-11

How to Cite

Effects of Intrathecal Midazolam (1mg) with Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% (15mg) for Spinal Anesthesia for Caesarean Section. (2025). Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(2), 86-91. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i2.639