Frequency of Uterine Scar Dehiscence Positive Scar in Women with Previous One Cesarean Section

Authors

  • Mehwish Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
  • Samina Jadoon Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
  • Hemasa Gul Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
  • Nayab Hakim Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan, KP, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i2.656

Keywords:

Uterine Scar Dehiscence, Cesarean Section, Hypertension, Parity

Abstract

Background: Uterine scar dehiscence is a significant complication in women with a history of cesarean section, with implications for maternal and fetal health. Identifying risk factors and early detection is crucial for improving outcomes. While various demographic and clinical factors have been implicated, the association between maternal age, gestational age, parity, and hypertension with uterine scar dehiscence has not been fully explored in the local population. Objective: To determine the frequency of uterine scar dehiscence in women with previous one cesarean section. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Duration and Place of Study: The study was conducted from January 2024 to July 2024 at a Mardan Medical Complex in Mardan, Pakistan.  Methodology: A total of 109 women aged 18–40 years, with a singleton pregnancy of >32 weeks gestation and abdominal pain, were included. Ultrasound was performed by a senior consultant radiologist to assess uterine scar dehiscence, with clinical criteria based on scar tenderness and specific ultrasound findings. Results: The overall incidence of uterine scar dehiscence was 13.8%, with higher rates observed in women over 30 years (23.6%), those with a gestational age >39 weeks (47.6%), and women with higher parity (>4; 48%). Significant associations were found between uterine scar dehiscence and maternal age (p=0.004), gestational age (p<0.001), parity (p<0.001), and hypertension (p<0.001). No significant association was found with diabetes (p=0.701). Conclusion: The study concludes uterine scar dehiscence is a significant complication in women with prior cesarean sections, influenced by factors like age, parity, and hypertension, emphasizing the need for further research and protocols.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yaqoub, R. M., Khouj, M. A., Alsaif, A. A., Eissa, G. A., Alhemdi, J. A., & Albasri, S. (2022). Awareness and knowledge of caesarean section complications among women in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32152

Abdelazim, I., & AbuFaza, M. (2021). Pfannenstiel incision for surgical excision of a huge pelvi-abdominalcystadenoma: A case report. Menopausal Review, 20(2), 99-102. https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2021.106469

Guo, J., Yang, D., Zhang, B., Xu, X., Yang, Z., Zhao, Y., Zheng, Z., Meng, X., & Zhang, T. (2023). The safety of Pfannenstiel incision for specimen extraction in laparoscopic colorectal surgery for colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2023.134194

Larsson, C., Djuvfelt, E., Lindam, A., Tunón, K., & Nordin, P. (2021). Surgical complications after caesarean section: A population-based cohort study. PLOS ONE, 16(10), e0258222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258222

Ahamed, F. M., Solkar, S., Stevikova, M., & Moya, B. P. (2022). Link between cesarean section scar defect and secondary infertility: Case reports and review. JBRA Assisted Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220009

Akhade, S. P., Ghormade, P. S., Bhengra, A., Chavali, K., & Hussain, N. (2021). Uterine scar rupture at the site of the placenta accreta presenting as a case of sudden death. Autopsy Case Reports, 11. https://doi.org/10.4322/acr.2020.226

Hussein, A. M., Elbarmelgy, R. A., Elbarmelgy, R. M., Thabet, M. M., & Jauniaux, E. (2022). Prospective evaluation of impact of post-Cesarean section uterine scarring in perinatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorder. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 59(4), 474-482. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23732

Shamoradifar, Z., Asghari-Jafarabadi, M., Nourizadeh, R., Mehrabi, E., Areshtanab, H. N., & Shaigan, H. (2022). The impact of effective communication-based care on the childbirth experience and satisfaction among primiparous women: An experimental study. Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association, 97(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42506-022-00108-2

Zhu, Z., Li, H., & Zhang, J. (2021). Uterine dehiscence in pregnant with previous caesarean delivery. Annals of Medicine, 53(1), 1266-1270. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1959049

Zermano, S., Seminara, G., Parisi, N., Serantoni, V., Arcieri, M., Biasioli, A., Della Martina, M., Restaino, S., Vizzielli, G., & Driul, L. (2024). Prenatal detection and conservative management of uterine scar dehiscence in patient with previous uterine rupture and multiple surgeries—A case report. Healthcare, 12(10), 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12100988

Siraj, S. H., Lional, K. M., Tan, K. H., & Wright, A. (2021). Repair of the myometrial scar defect at repeat caesarean section: A modified surgical technique. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04040-9

Chawanpaiboon, S., Sompagdee, N., Kaewsrinual, S., Srikrisanapol, K., Jitmuang, A., Matrakool, P., Yodying, J., Sakrattana-anant, T., Wangmanao, P., Songsirithat, P., Saengsiriwudh, R., Ngowsirigool, K., Jesrichai, J., & Wasinsangworn, T. (2024). Severe complications of uterine dehiscence post-lower segment cesarean section: A case report emphasizing the importance of timely diagnosis and intervention. American Journal of Case Reports, 25. https://doi.org/10.12659/ajcr.943027

Khan, F. K., Khurshid, S., Zafar, S., Zanaib, S., Zakria, M., & Asif, S. (2019). Scar Dehiscence in Patients Presenting with Scar Tenderness Due to Previous One Cesarean Section. Journal of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Pakistan, 9(4), 243-246. https://www.jsogp.net/index.php/jsogp/article/view/250

Sultana, R., & Zia, U. (2022). Uterine Scar Dehiscence in Elective Versus Emergency Caesarean Section. Journal of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Pakistan, 12(2), 120-124. https://www.jsogp.net/index.php/jsogp/article/view/476

Zeb, L., & Hina. (2023). Frequency of scar dehiscence in patients with previous one caesarean section having scar tenderness. Journal of Khyber College of Dentistry, 13(3), 45-48. https://doi.org/10.33279/jkcd.v13i3.179

Ramadan, M. K., Kassem, S., Itani, S., Sinno, L., Hussein, S., Chahin, R., & Badr, D. A. (2018). Incidence and risk factors of uterine scar dehiscence identified at elective repeat cesarean delivery: A case-control study. Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, 7(2), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo481w

HUSSAIN, S., AMMARA, U., MAHMOOD, A., NAZ, U., HANIF, S., & SALEEM, A. Frequency of Scar Dehiscence on Repeat Cesarean Section at Term in Patients with Trial of Labor. Hypertension, 14, 67. https://pjmhsonline.com/2021/jan/551.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-02-20

How to Cite

Frequency of Uterine Scar Dehiscence Positive Scar in Women with Previous One Cesarean Section. (2025). Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(2), 239-244. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i2.656