Comparison of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty with Open Inguinal Hernioplasty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i3.2245Keywords:
Inguinal Hernia, Laparoscopic Hernia, Seroma.Abstract
Overview: Repairing an inguinal hernia is a common surgical procedure. For the management of an inguinal hernia, there is no conclusive therapy. My study's findings will be useful in highlighting an improved strategy for managing inguinal hernias, reducing the likelihood of post-operative complications and promoting early recovery for patients. Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial was done on 150 (75 in each group) patients at Department of Surgery, Madina Teaching Hospital, Faisalabad. Patients of age ranges from 20–60 years of both genders undergoing inguinal hernioplasty for inguinal hernia were included. Recurrent irreducible and strangulated hernia, obstructed hernia, skin infections, concomitant conditions (type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary artery disease, or tuberculosis) were excluded. All the patients were randomly divided into two groups by using a computer-generated random number table. In group 1, patients were undergone open inguinal hernioplasty and in group 2, patients were undergone laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty. Post-operative pain was assessed after 1st and 4th weeks of surgery. Wound seroma was assessed after 1st week of surgery. Hospital stay and return to normal activities was assessed. Results: Patients in the laparoscopic group had a statistically significant (p = 0.0001) lower mean length of hospital stay than those in the open group (1.06 ± 0.84 versus 2.43 ± 1.63 days). For laparoscopic repair, the mean days of return to normal activity was 5.57 ± 1.85, but for open repair, it was 9.51 ± 2.98 (p-value = 0.0001). There were 03 seromas (4.0%) following a week of laparoscopic hernia repair, 09 (12.0%) following a week of open hernia surgery. These differences were not statistically significant. At weeks one and four, patients who had laparoscopic surgery (6.67%) reported less post-operative pain than those who had open surgery (20.0%); this difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: Laparoscopic hernia repair is preferable over open surgery due to its reduced risk of complications, faster recovery period, and shorter hospital stay.
Downloads
References
1. Aslam, R. S., Hassaan, M., Rashid, J., & Arshid, A. (2023). Comparison of post-operative pain after lap mesh Hernioplasty and open mesh Hernioplasty. Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 17(1), 292-294.
https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2023171292
2. Haladu, N., Alabi, A., Brazzelli, M., Imamura, M., Ahmed, I., Ramsay, G., & Scott, N. W. (2022). Open versus laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: An overview of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Surgical Endoscopy, 36(7), 4685-4700.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09161-6
3. Reghunandanan, R. P., Usman, A. A., Basheer, S., Kuttichi, L., Jojo, J. E., & Abdul Rasheed, M. F. (2023). Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: A comparative study. Cureus.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.48619
4. Naqvi, S. S., Abbas, S., Hanif, H., Khan, R. A., Bukhari, S. M., & Ahmed, S. A. (2023). Open mesh Hernioplasty versus Laparoscopic total Extraperitoneal mesh repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia. Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 17(2), 844-846.
https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2023172844
5. Zhu, X., Liu, Z., Shen, J., Liu, J., & Tang, R. (2020). Comparison of open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in octogenarians at a single center.
https://doi.org/10.22541/au.160491826.61129759/v1
6. Ahmed, A., Hashim, I., Mehmood, F., Haider, N., Chattha, A. A., & Ayub, A. (2022). Outcome of laparoscopic percutaneous extra peritoneal closure versus open repair for paediatric inguinal hernia. A randomized control trial. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, 34(3), 403-406.
https://doi.org/10.55519/jamc-03-10505
7. Gupta, D., & Rohatgi, M. (1993). Inguinal hernia in children: And Indian experience. Pediatric Surgery International, 8(6).
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00180345
8. Charles, M. R., Christian, L. B., Sen, T., Mahapatra, S., & Joshi, B. R. (1970). A two year retrospective study of congenital inguinal hernia at western regional hospital. Journal of Nepal Medical Association, 39(133), 172-175.
https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.687
9. McCormack, K., Scott, N., Go, P. M., Ross, S. J., & Grant, A. (2003). Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2010(1).
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001785
10. Eklund, A., Rudberg, C., Smedberg, S., Enander, L. K., Leijonmarck, C. E., Österberg, J., & Montgomery, A. (2006). Short-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. British Journal of Surgery, 93(9), 1060-1068.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5405
11. Mehmood, Z., ul Islam, Z., & Shah, S. S. H. (2014). Open Lichtenstein repair versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia. Journal of Surgery Pakistan (International), 19, 2.
12. Galeti, E. H., Gundluru, R., & Sowdagar, G. B. (2016). A comparative study of laparoscopic Tep and open Lichtenstein’s tension-free hernia repair: A single surgical unit experience. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 5(80), 5956-5958.
https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2016/1345
13. Garg, P., Pai, S. A., & Vijaykumar, H. (2018). Comparison of early postoperative outcome of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia mesh repair. International Surgery Journal, 5(8), 2732.
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20183007
14. Murthy, P. K., & Ravalia, D. (2018). Assessment and comparison of laparoscopic hernia repair versus open hernia: A non-randomized study. International Surgery Journal, 5(3), 1021.
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20180823
15. Shah, N. R., Mikami, D. J., Cook, C., Manilchuk, A., Hodges, C., Memark, V. R., Volckmann, E. T., Hall, C. R., Steinberg, S., Needleman, B., Hazey, J. W., Melvin, W. S., & Narula, V. K. (2011). A comparison of outcomes between open and laparoscopic surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernias. Surgical Endoscopy, 25(7), 2330-2337.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1564-2
16. Wellwood, J., Sculpher, M. J., Stoker, D., Nicholls, G. J., Geddes, C., Whitehead, A., Singh, R., & Spiegelhalter, D. (1998). Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: Outcome and cost. BMJ, 317(7151), 103-110.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7151.103
17. Choudhary, S., Soni, H., Mehta, J. M., & Kalia, S. (2021). A prospective comparative study of outcome between open Lichtenstein versus laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 9(5), 1417.
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20211879
18. Liem, M. S., Van Duyn, E. B., Van der Graaf, Y., & Van Vroonhoven, T. J. (2003). Recurrences after conventional anterior and Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Annals of Surgery, 237(1), 136-141.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200301000-00019
19. Hamza, Y., Gabr, E., Hammadi, H., & Khalil, R. (2010). Four-arm randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open hernia repairs. International Journal of Surgery, 8(1), 25-28.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.09.010
20. Ortenzi, M., Williams, S., Solanki, N., Guerrieri, M., & Haji, A. (2020). Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: Retrospective comparison of TEP and TAPP procedures in a tertiary referral center. Minerva Chirurgica, 75(5).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
