HCN Content Estimation in Different Sorghum Genotypes under Rainfed Conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i3.846Keywords:
Sorghum, Hydrocyanic Acid (HCN) Sugar Content (Bx0) Subtropical rainfed conditionsAbstract
Sorghum is most important fodder in dry land areas. It has ability to tolerate high temperature and grow under minimal soil moisture conditions but under drought stress, the HCN content in sorghum increases which is dangerous for animals when used as fodder. Keeping in mind a study was conducted to measure HCN content in different genotypes of sorghum. The research materials were consisted of fifty-six genotypes and three check varieties. The experiment was laid out in an augmented block design at University Research Farm Chakwal Road during kharif season 2018. Samples were collected thirty days after germination and total cyanide was measured by picrate paper method. Results revealed that concentration of HCN varies significantly from genotype to genotype in comparison with checks. Lowest HCN content was found in genotypes JS-263, I-4 and S-9901 that was 201, 209 and 213 (mg/100g) so these genotypes can be used safely for fodder purposes in rainfed areas. Overall these genotypes JS-263, PARC-SS-2, PARC-SU-2, I-5, I-4, Nilli bar, YSS-4, Fri-04, JS-07, YSS-15 and YSS-98 performed good for all studied morphological traits. Significant negative correlation of HCN was observed with sugar content which shows that genotypes with high sugar content will have least HCN content. The results show significant variation among genotypes. JS-263, FM-147, PARC-SU-2, PARC-SS-2, and Nillibar performed well and can be used as fodder. Genetic parameters confirm potential for improving fodder yield. This study highlights genetic variability, indicating strong potential for trait improvement in sorghum breeding programs.
Downloads
References
AL-Sultan, S. I. (2003). Sorghum Halepenses and its Cyanide Content. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 2(3), 123–124. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2003.123.124
Bradbury, M. G., Egan, S. V., & Bradbury, J. H. (1999). Picrate paper kits for determination of total cyanogens in cassava roots and all forms of cyanogens in cassava products. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 79(4), 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0010(19990315)79:4%3C593::aid-jsfa222%3E3.0.co;2-2
Elkhier, M. K. S., & Hamid, A. O. (2008). Effect of malting on the chemical constituents, antinutrition factors and ash composition of two sorghum cultivars (feterita and tabat) grown in Sudan. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 4(5), 500-504.
GOP, 2022-2023. Economic Survey Govt. of Pakistan, p: 19. Finance Division, Economic Advertiser Wing. Islamabad, Pakistan.
Hoveland, C. S., & Monson, W. G. (1980). Genetic and environmental effects on forage quality. Crop quality, storage, and utilization, 139-168. https://doi.org/10.2135/1980.cropquality.c6
Iqbal, M. A., & Iqbal, A. (2015). Overview on sorghum for food, feed, forage and fodder: Opportunities and problems in Pakistan’s perspectives. Am.-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci, 15, 1818-1826.
Jadav, C. N. (2020). Determination of hydrocyanic acid (HCN) in sorghum vulgare (Gundrijowar) fodder during kharif season. Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Biosciences, 8(4), 76-79. https://doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8116
Johnson, H. W., Robinson, H. F., & Comstock, R. E. (1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agronomy Journal, 47(7), 314-318. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x
Karthika, N., & Kalpana, R. (2017). HCN content and forage yield of multi-cut forage sorghum under different organic manures and nitrogen levels. Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett, 6(23), 1659-1663.
National Agriculture Research Centre (NARC) 2011. Fodder Production in Pakistan. National Coordinated Fodder Research Programme at NARC, Islamabad. www.parc.gov.pk/NARC/narc.html
Nawaz, S., Zammurad, I. A., Ansar, M., Manaf, A., Qayyum, A., & Sher, A. (2017). Agronomic efficiency and HCN content of sorghum cultivars as influenced by zinc and boron application under subtropical condition. Z Arznei-Gewurpfla, 22(4), 160-164.
Pandey, R. K., Kumar, D., & Jadhav, K. M. (2011). Assessment of determinants for reducing HCN content in sorghum used for ruminant in Gujarat, India. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 23(3), 1-7. http://lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd23/3/pand23066.htm
Pushpa, K., Madhu, P., & Venkatesh, B. B. (2019). Estimation of HCN content in sorghum under irrigated and stressed conditions. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(3), 2583-2585.
Sarwar, M., Khan, M. A., & Iqbal, Z. (2002). Status paper feed resources for livestock in Pakistan. Int. J. Agric. Biol, 4(1), 186-192. https://livestockmanagement.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/reading-assignment-4-2.pdf
Sher, A., Sami Ul-Allah, Sattar, A., Barbanti, L., & Ijaz, M. (2023). Characterizing sorghum genotypes for forage yield, hydrocyanic acid and sugar contents under arid climate conditions. Plant Genetic Resources, 21(4), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479262123000849
Smith, C. W., & Frederiksen, R. A. (Eds.). (2000). Sorghum: origin, history, technology, and production (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
Steel, R. G., & Torrie, J. H. (1980). Principles and procedures of statistics, a biometrical approach (No. Ed. 2). McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Ltd.
Vough, L. R., & Cassel, E. K. (2000). Prussic acid poisoning of livestock: causes and prevention, a newsletter. Extension information resource management specialist. South Dakota State University. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/extension_extra/115
BIAN, Y., Yazaki, S., Inoue, M., & CAI, H. (2006). QTLs for Sugar Content of Stalk in Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Agricultural Sciences in China, 5(10), 736–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1671-2927(06)60118-1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
