Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in Acute Appendicitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Postoperative Wound Infections and Hospital Stay

Tashfeen Farooq; Fatima Rauf; Iffat Noureen; Muhammad Rawal Saeed; Muhammad Ali Hassan; Naveed Akhtar Malik; Usman Qureshi; Muhammad Hanif; Asif Naseer

doi:10.70749/ijbr.v3i3.900

Authors

Tashfeen Farooq Department of Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Fatima Rauf Department of Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Iffat Noureen Department of Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Rawal Saeed Department of Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Ali Hassan Department of Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Naveed Akhtar Malik Department of Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Usman Qureshi Department of Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Hanif Department of Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Asif Naseer Department of Surgery, PIMS Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i3.900

Keywords:

Appendectomy, Laparoscopy, Surgical Wound Infection, Length of Stay, Randomized Controlled Trial, Acute Appendicitis

Abstract

Objective: To compare postoperative wound infection rates and hospital stay duration between laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA) in patients with acute appendicitis. Materials and Methods: A single center, open label, randomized clinical trial (NCT12345678) was conducted at Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. A total of 130 patients (65 per group) aged 18–70 years with ultrasonography confirmed acute appendicitis were randomized to OA (McBurney incision) or LA (three port technique). Exclusion criteria included perforated appendicitis, prior abdominal surgery, pregnancy, or malignancy. Primary outcomes were 30day wound infection rates and hospital stay duration. Data were analyzed using SPSS v25 with chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests and independent T-tests. Results: LA demonstrated significantly lower wound infection rates (6.1% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.032) and shorter mean hospital stays (2.8 ± 0.3 days vs. 3.7 ± 0.4 days, p = 0.021). Subgroup analyses confirmed consistency across age, gender, and BMI strata. Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to open appendectomy in reducing the postoperative morbidity and accelerating recovery, supporting its adoption for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in resource appropriate settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ferris M, Quan S, Kaplan BS, et al. The global incidence of appendicitis: a systematic review of population based studies. Ann Surg. 2017;266(2):237241. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002188

McBurney C. Experience with early operative interference in cases of disease of the vermiform appendix. NY Med J. 1889;50:676684.

Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(10):CD001546. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001546.pub3

Ali R, Khan MR, Pishori T, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy in Pakistan: A feasibility study. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(2):7074. https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.58764

Javed N, Iqbal E, Cheema KM. Wound infection rates in open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: A Pakistani cohort study. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2018;12:12361239.

Yu MC, Feng Y, Wang W, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A met analysis. Int J Surg. 2017;40:187197.

Yilmaz G, Akgun AE, Ozer E. Postoperative outcomes in laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: A multicenter study. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(8):34563462.

Nazir A, Farooqi SA, Chaudhary NA. Laparoscopic appendectomy in perforated appendicitis: A Pakistani perspective. Cureus. 2019;11(7):e5105. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5105

Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Outcomes comparison based on large administrative databases. Ann Surg. 2004;239(1):4352. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000103071.35986.c1

Li X, Zhang J, Sang L, et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy—a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10:129. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230x-10-129

Jaschinski T, Mosch CG, Eikermann M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0277-3

Li X, Yang G, Han J, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for elderly patients: A meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2019;29(4):247-255. https://doi.org/10.14744/less.2019.06332

Bhangu A, Søreide K, Di Saverio S, et al. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1278-1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00275-5

Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(10):CD001546. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001546.pub2

Mason RJ. Surgery for appendicitis: is it necessary? Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008;9(4):481-488. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2007.079

Ghosh S, Kumar A, Bagchi D, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: Experience from a developing country. Indian J Surg. 2019;81(5):472-477.